VOLUME 12 ISSUE 1 SPRING 2026

14 Spirituality Studies  3.7 Data Analysis Qualitative debrief responses were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke 2006) with iterative familiarization, coding, theme development, review, and write-up. Themes are reported with verbatim excerpts (P01–P60). Integration of quantitative and qualitative findings occurred during interpretation by comparing quantitative pre-post patterns with qualitative themes to identify convergence and complementarity; interpretations are framed as associative rather than causal due to the single-group design. No missing questionnaire data were observed; all sixty participants completed all pre‑ and post‑intervention items. 3.8 Ethical Considerations Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the researcher’s institution (Approval Code R.81/2025), granted on 10 March 2025. All participants provided written informed consent prior to participation and were informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any time without penalty. Participant confidentiality was strictly maintained, and all data were used solely for research purposes. 3.9 Integration of Findings Findings from both quantitative and qualitative data were integrated during the interpretation phase using a triangulation approach. We examined convergence between observed pre-post score changes and participants’ reported experiences and used qualitative themes to contextualize and explain patterns in the quantitative outcomes. Because the study did not include a control group, integrated interpretations are presented as preliminary and non-causal. 4 Results 4.1 Burnout Outcomes Burnout was assessed across three dimensions: Exhaustion, Cynicism, and Professional Efficacy before and after the WPRM intervention. Paired-sample t-tests were conducted to evaluate changes between pre- and post-intervention scores. The table below summarizes the statistical results. The analysis revealed extremely large within-participant pre-post differences across burnout dimensions. Specifically, Cohen’s dz values were 2.81 for Exhaustion, 2.40 for Cynicism, and −0.61 for Professional Efficacy. Because the paired t-tests were computed on pre minus post scores, positive t (and dz) values for Exhaustion and Cynicism indicate reductions in these burnout symptoms, whereas the negative value for Professional Efficacy indicates an increase in professional efficacy (the inverse burnout dimension). 4.1.1 Exhaustion (EE) The chart illustrates the mean EE scores before and after the intervention. In the pre-test, the average score was 4.66 (Very High), indicating a severe level of emotional fatigue. After the intervention, the score decreased to 1.87 (Medium Low), representing a 2.79-point reduction across three severity levels. Consistent with this pattern, exhaustion scores showed a significant decrease from pre-intervention (M = 4.66, SD = 0.76) to post-intervention (M = 1.87, SD = 0.65), t(59) = 21.74, p <.001 (see Table 3). This substantial reduction reflects a marked improvement in emotional fatigue following the WPRM intervention. 4.1.2 Cynicism (CY) The chart displays mean scores for CY, a core indicator of burnout, measured pre- and post-intervention. At baseline, the mean score was 3.84 (High), reflecting significant emotional detachment and disengagement from work. After the intervention, the score dropped to 1.24 (Medium Low), representing a 2.6-point decrease spanning three categorical levels. Consistent with this overall trend, cynicism also showed a significant decline, from M = 3.84 (SD = 0.89) to M = 1.24 (SD = 0.62), t(59) = 18.62, p <.001. This substantial reduction reflects improved work-related attitudes, reduced emotional withdrawal, and greater psychological engagement. The findings suggest that the intervention ef-

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTUwMDU5Ng==