66 Spirituality Studies 11-1 Spring 2025 Table 4 includes general and specific indirect effects, whose data indicate that only one indirect effect presents statistically significant relationships (IE2: TE=.0163, SE=.0082, 95% CI), corresponding to the relationship between religiosity, negative self-esteem, and purpose of life (see Figure 2). Table 4 Indirect Effects of the Serial Multiple Mediation Model of the Effect of Religiosity (X) on Life Purpose (Y) through Positive Self-Esteem (M1) and Negative Self-Esteem (M2) INDIRECT EFFECTS Indirect Effect 1 Religiosity → Positive self-esteem → Purpose in life. Coefficient=.0241, SE=.0163, Interval BC 95% CI: -.0076, .0559. Indirect Effect 2 Religiosity → Negative self-esteem → Purpose in life. Coefficient=.0184, SE=.0094, Interval BC 95% CI: .0012, .0387. Indirect Effect 3 Religiosity → Positive self-esteem → Negative self-esteem → Purpose in life. Coefficient=−.0057, SE=.0102, Interval BC 95% CI: -.0268, .0132. Bootstrapping BC 95% CI Effect BootSE BootLLCI BootULCI IE1:X=>M1=>Y .0241 .0163 -.0076 .0559 IE2:X=>M2=>Y .0184 .0094 .0012 .0387 IE3:X=>M1=>M2=>Y -.0057 .0102 -.0268 .0132 Figure 2 Conceptual Representation of the Theoretical Model (b1) b=.682 p=.000 (b2) b=-.517 p=.000 (a1) b=.037 p=.003 (a2) b=-.007 p=.548 Self-Esteem (negative) Self-Esteem (positive) Religiosity Purpose in Life (c) b=.116; p=.000 (c’) b=.078; p=.000 (d2 1) b=-.465; p=.000
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTUwMDU5Ng==