S p i r i t ua l i t y S t u d i e s 6 - 2 Fa l l 2 0 2 0 5 5 Srikanth N. Jois Tab. 3. Frequency, Percentage and Independence of Different Experiences of Prānic Energy Based on Qualitative Perception Type of Prānic En - ergy Experiences Prānic Energy Perception Based on Quality Total Statistics Frequency % Temperature No experience 36 12 X2 =140 p=.000 Cool 28 9.4 Warm 157 52.5 Feeling both 78 26.1 Lightness No experience 66 22.1 X2 =36.97 p=.000 Light 148 49.5 Heavy 85 28.4 Finger palm No experience 27 9 X2 =129.35 p=.000 Finger only 44 14.7 Palm only 73 24.4 Both 155 51.8 Pulsation No experience 80 26.8 X2 =12.291 p=.006 Slight 94 31.4 Medium 73 24.4 Strong 52 17.4 In Table 3, the prānic energy perception of temperature in between hands based on the quality shows that 36 (12%) did not felt temperature experience, 28 (9.4%) felt it as cool sensation, 157 (52.5%) felt it as warm, and 78 (26.1%) felt both warm and cool. The prānic energy perception of light - ness in between hands based on the quality of experience shows that 66 (22.1%) did not felt lightness experience, 148 (49.5%) felt it as light sensation in between their hands, and 85 (28.4%) felt it as heavy. The prānic energy perception in finger or palms shows that 27 (9%) did not felt prānic experi - ence in palm or finger, 44 (14.7%) felt it in palm only, 73 (24.4%) felt it in finger only, and 155 (51.8%) felt it both in palm and finger. The pulsation energy experience in be - tween palms reported that 80 (26.8%) did not experience pulsation, 94 (31.4%) experienced slight pulsation, felt it in palm only, 73 (24.4%) felt it medium, and 52 (17.4%) felt strong experience of pulsation. Based on the quality of energy experiences the subcategories of experiences of temperature (X2 =140, p.000), lightness (X2 =36.97, p.000), finger/palm (X2 =129.35, p.000), pulsation (X2 =12.291, p.006) are different from one another.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MzgxMzI=